The term
"writing with substance" involves the utmost engagement of the
reader. This is done through a plethora of writing techniques. Ultimately, if
the content carries enough dimensions, upon which the reader immerses
themselves in, the text is considered good. Often, these dimensions involve the
reader gathering information about the characters in various ways. This
information is usually discovered through reading conversations between
characters and through first-person narration. In some cases, the level of
immersion used in discovering new information involves reading the character's
internal thought processes and line of thinking.
This level of
immersion is called the stream of consciousness. It is a method of narration
that describes the flow of thoughts in the minds of the characters, in words.
The stream of consciousness is often referred to as "interior
monologue". The "narration" provides the readers with the
sensation of being inside the characters minds. It provides a personal
connection between character and reader, as characters, within the stream of
consciousness, often mentally address the audience or other characters.
Usually, the stream of consciousness is used as a revealing element in
literature, as it is a clear method of communicating the idea of the plot. This
is mainly done informally (generally lacking "proper" punctuation),
as inner-thoughts are often thought in continuous sequences.
This example is
the introductory (opening) paragraph, in the literary text, The Door by E.B. White.
"Everything
(he kept saying) is something it isn't. And everybody is always somewhere else.
Maybe it was the city, being in the city, that made him feel how queer
everything was and that it was something else. Maybe (he kept thinking) it was
the names of the things. The names were tex and frequently koid. Or they were
flex and oid or they were duroid (sani) or flexsan (duro), but everything was
glass (but not quite glass) and the thing that you touched (the surface,
washable, crease-resistant) was rubber, only it wasn't quite rubber and you
didn't quite touch it but almost. The wall, which was glass but turned out on
being approached not to be a wall, it was something else, it was an opening or
doorway--and the doorway (through which he saw himself approaching) turned out
to be something else, it was a wall. And what he had eaten not having agreed
with him."
As demonstrated here, this paragraph is
a stream of thoughts that carry out in sequence. This shows the difference
between a typical narration and an internal monologue. The author
clarifies himself with the use of words in brackets. This is done
to further achieve a sense of personal engagement between the
character and the reader.
Your introduction to this post was creative and impressive. You provided some good background information on the Stream of Consciousness. Quotes and evidence were provided, however try to limit the text and give specific quotes. Good Job.
ReplyDeleteGood work Aaron. I do feel like you could have analyzed more of the passage excerpt you put into this post and linking the technique more to Said's circumstances. But you did well in describing the whole technique
ReplyDeleteA little bit late, however the post shows understanding and appreciation of the context which was well worded. Concentrate on discussing the advantages and disadvantages in contributing to the plot.
ReplyDelete